• This Month on WestView News
  • Featured
  • Monthly Columns
  • Editorials
  • Articles
  • Briefly Noted
  • WestViews
  • Photos
  • Front Page
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • EXTRA
WESTVIEW NEWS
Menu
  • This Month on WestView News
  • Featured
  • Monthly Columns
  • Editorials
  • Articles
  • Briefly Noted
  • WestViews
  • Photos
 › Articles › The Pro Act (Protecting the Right to Organize): Potential Implications of the Most Transformative Labor Bill Since the 1940s

The Pro Act (Protecting the Right to Organize): Potential Implications of the Most Transformative Labor Bill Since the 1940s

Web Admin 07/02/2021     Articles

By Samuel Dobre, Esq. & Michael Kratochvil

While the Biden administration has quickly ushered in a number of changes to the administrative side of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Congress has been considering an even more consequential labor matter: the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act.

This bill has already made it through the House of Representatives but faces an uphill battle in the Senate because of its significant implications for labor relations throughout the country.

Specifically, the PRO Act promises a number of changes to the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), a statute that has governed labor relations in the United States since the 1930s. While the NLRA has been relatively unaltered since the 1947 Taft-Hartley Amendments, the PRO Act presents a new effort to shift the balance of power from employers to employees and unions. The following details four key potential changes, among others:

Bolstering Remedies

The NLRA has been criticized by many individuals in the labor field for lacking the “teeth” that many other administrative statutes have. Currently, the NLRA only permits (1) make-whole remedies (i.e., reinstatement, back pay, etc.); (2) informational remedies (i.e., the posting of signs concerning conduct that violates the NLRA); and (3) injunctive relief. 

With the PRO Act, employees would be able to receive monetary damages for violations of the NLRA. In addition, the NLRB would be able to assess further penalties for noncompliance with NLRB orders. Adding damages and civil penalties (potentially ranging from $50,000 to $100,000 for unlawful discharge or “other serious economic harm to an employee” if the employer has committed a similar violation within the preceding five years) would significantly raise the stakes of labor relations to a level never before seen in this country’s history.

Eliminating “Right-To-Work” Laws 

In 28 states, employees laboring as a part of a unionized workforce are not obligated to pay union dues. In other words, even if a union has been duly elected to represent a group of workers, any employee in that group would have the right to refuse to pay union dues while still retaining the representation of that union. The PRO Act would eliminate this ability to opt out of paying union dues.

Changing Definitions

Currently, independent contractors, supervisors, and other management staff are largely unprotected by the NLRA. The PRO Act would alter the definition of employees, supervisors, and employers to include more individuals under the gamut of the NLRA.

Altering Rights of Employees and Employers

There are a number of other changes impacting the rights of employees and employers:

Employees

The PRO Act would reverse long-standing case law and permit secondary strikes, meaning that unions could picket a neutral employer for the purpose of coercing it to stop doing business with the primary employer. 

Employers

The PRO Act would prohibit certain conduct by employers in an effort to increase the power of employees in the following ways:

(I) Employers would be prevented from permanently replacing employees who participated in strikes. 

(II) Employers would no longer be able to limit an employee’s right to pursue or join collective or class-action litigation.

(III) Employers would be prohibited from taking adverse action against an employee, including those with management responsibilities, in response to that employee participating in protected activities related to the enforcement of the prohibitions against unfair labor practices. To put it in simpler terms, whistleblower protections would be expanded considerably. 

(IV) The dynamics of union elections would be altered by (a) preventing employers from requiring or coercing employees to attend employer meetings designed to discourage union membership and (b) permitting employees to vote in such elections remotely by telephone or the internet.

The future of the PRO Act is undetermined. Nevertheless, employers and employees should remain on notice given the widespread legal implications of these potential changes.


Please contact Bond, Schoeneck & King’s labor and employment attorneys if you have any questions or would like additional information regarding the potential scope of exposure, mitigation, and/or other legal developments arising in labor relations.

 Previous Post

How to Renovate An Apartment While Recycling

Next Post 

Everything Old is New Again in the West Village

Related Articles

Failure is an Option
Feeling Hot, Hot, Hot!
Embrace the Absurd
The Back Of House
Bonfires of the American Dream
Hair—The Dawning of the Age of Aquarius
Surviving Greenwich Village in 2022
Sinclair Lewis and 69 Charles St. (1909-1913)
Growing Up in Greenwich Village
Outdoor Comforts
How to Age in Place
A Remarkable Man
Mom & Pops Suffer Loss of St. Vincent’s
Cleopatra: The Last Greek Queen and Ruling Pharaoh of Egypt
News that’s easy to digest: Northwell Health Brings Endoscopy and Colonoscopy Services to the West Village
OPINION: Why I am Supporting Mondaire Jones for Congress
No Monkey Business with Monkey Pox in NYC
Hoylman Cancels Debate
Summertime Is Here—It’s Time For Gratitude!
Whose Class Is it Anyway?
The Queen of Camelot and The Quest for Camelot
76 Years and Counting: How NY Greek American Soccer Club Has Influenced the City’s Hellenic Culture
Jerry Banu, the Mayor of Perry Street: A Remembrance
Washington Square Park’s Unconventional Dance Icon
Below the Fold
West Village Houses Votes to Sustain Jane Jacobs’ Vision
Jake Sinacori’s Hamptons Guide
Local Finds. Local Love.
Greenwich Village Little League Enjoys Memorial Day Tournament and Honors Former Board Member
Lifetalk with Roberta Russell: Peer Therapy for Overweight and Obesity — Learning From Each Other
Breaking Free of Co-dependency
Body&Soul
As COVID Cases Rise, Remember What Works
Creative Brain: Creativity is for Everyone and Within Everyone’s Reach
Outtakes
Operation Overlord: The Day that Changed the Tide
PRIDE
Pride in the Shadow of Roe v. Wade

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

August 2022

Subscribe Now

August 2022

Donate Now

 

Read the Archives

Copyright © WestView News