• This Month on WestView News
  • Featured
  • Monthly Columns
  • Editorials
  • Articles
  • Briefly Noted
  • WestViews
  • Photos
  • Front Page
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • EXTRA
Menu
  • This Month on WestView News
  • Featured
  • Monthly Columns
  • Editorials
  • Articles
  • Briefly Noted
  • WestViews
  • Photos
Home › Articles › Real Estate/Renting › Thumb On the Scale? 11 Jane St. Developer Invited to Re-Rebut Community Concerns!

Thumb On the Scale? 11 Jane St. Developer Invited to Re-Rebut Community Concerns!

admin September 5, 2016     Articles, Real Estate/Renting

By Robert Widmann

Contrary to indications, and with only nine hours notice, absent the weekend, the Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC), at 10:00 AM Tuesday, July 26th, held a follow-up hearing to that held on June 21st. This time it succeeded in shaking itself loose of the 100-plus neighbors, community members, and opponents to the development at 11 Jane Street of a super-deluxe, six-story-plus condo building to replace a 94-year-old parking garage.

With only six or seven members of the community present to hold placards expressing opposition, the developer’s side was invited to once again rebut some of the community’s most telling points and concerns. This it did by re-running, not once but several times, its original slide show with commentary by the architect, the developer, the presentation manager, and one or two other individuals. The theme was the same as last time: The developer seeks to leverage the 95-foot structure into existence by averaging this structure in with the real estate errors and exploitations of the Village of the past.

The developer’s side was able to find a description from the 60’s LPC of the garage structure as being essentially not worth protecting. This led to some puzzlement on the part of several commissioners as to whether the present commission was bound by such language. It was decided—uh, no—probably not.

Several commissioners did find the proposed building out of scale, but others were chiefly concerned about window treatment (trabeated fenestration) or choice of building materials.

Towards the end of the meeting, community concern about the scale of the proposed structure took a body slam, seemingly from out of nowhere. The Chair, Meenakshi Srinivasan, announced blandly, and with no explanation, “I have no problem with the height,” referring to the street-side height of 61 feet.

Once again, the hearing was tabled. But, confidentially, it doesn’t look too good.

Note to Commissioners: Look folks, this is not essential housing or a hospital. It is a super-deluxe structure for just seven owners, their Bentleys and Lamborghinis. At close to 30,000 sq. ft. saleable, does it really have to be so big?

 Previous Post

Epidemiology— We are the Canary

Next Post 

No, I Did Not Visit Tokyo Disneyland

Related Articles

Ceviche Mixto garnished with Maitz Tostado
Peruvian Food by Way of a 7th Avenue Model
Deirdre Anderson
Elegant Dining at Home: It Might be Cheaper Than You Think
Brianna Thomas
Greenwich House Celebrates Women Artists With Community Concert Series

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

April 2018

Sign up for WestView News EXTRA- the breaking news newsletter

Visit our sponsors

 

Topics

  • Art & Architecture
  • Arts and Culture
  • Science/Nature
  • Food
  • Medical
  • Neighborhood
  • Expanded Caption
  • News
  • Opinion
  • People
  • Politics
  • Real Estate

Download WestView

Download Now:
April 2018 WestView News PDF

Donate

Make a donation to WestView





Subscribe Now

Subscribe to WestView News!

Read the Archives

WestView

Copyright © WestView News